In Re Olson,
175 B.R. 30 (Bankr. D. Neb. 1994)
IRS is entitled to relief from
the stay after confirmation to setoff prepetition tax claim
against tax refund because debtor has failed to offer adequate
protection for the refund. "The debtors did not submit
any evidence at the hearing that they could provide the IRS
with additional adequate protection of the [$299 tax refund]….If
the debtors are going to use the $299 for ordinary living
expenses, the debtors must offer new collateral or make cash
payments to the IRS equal to the diminution in the value of
the collateral as the debtors spend the money. The debtors'
argument that the plan payments will pay the IRS's claim in
full and therefore constitutes adequate protection of the
IRS's setoff right is without merit."
In Re Eynetich,
98 B.R. 966 (Bankr. D. Neb. 1988)
Debtor has burden to prove that
home is necessary to an effective reorganization under 11
U.S.C. § 362(d)(2). Where debtor produces no evidence, the
mortgage holder is entitled to relief from the stay
|